7 Sucralose Side Effects-Updated for 2018 Research

What is Sucralose?

Sucralose (Splenda): Good or Bad?
In case you missed the studies, here is a good start. However, it may be a bad choice for high-heat cooking and baking, and it may be something to look at if you have persistent problems related to gut health. These reports have included such side effects as:. Sucralose has been tested and proven to be safe for use by children of all ages. Possible Side Effects of Maltodextrin and Sucralose.

Start a 3FC Blog

11 Sucralose Side Effects

We need to keep an eye on the effects of sucralose and artificial sweeteners to ensure that they are safe in the long term. There have been very few human clinical trials into the safety of sucralose or Splenda and only two trials were ever published prior to the FDA approving the stuff for human use. Those two trials actually involved 36 human subjects.

Yes, you heard that right… before approving sucralose, there was a grand total of 2 completed studies involving 36 participants. But that is not all…the longest completed and the published trial lasted all of four days and actually examined the effect of sucralose regarding tooth decay rather than any other human tolerance issues.

While the FDA is not lying when they tell you that they have reviewed more than a hundred studies on Splenda, they fail to tell you that the vast majority of these studies were conducted on animals rather than humans. The results of these animal studies indicate that there are plenty of potential issues including the following potential problems. If you are pregnant and you are using artificial sweeteners then it is certainly worth taking a look at some recent research into its potential effects on your child.

Studies conducted on animals had already demonstrated that the exposure of an unborn offspring to artificial sweeteners resulted in a greater likelihood of the baby becoming overweight or developing obesity but until recently the link had not been explored in humans. The Canadian study which was published very recently in May was set up to examine the link between artificial sweeteners during pregnancy and obesity in infants.

The study included pregnant volunteers and estimated their dietary intake by means of a food questionnaire during the second and third trimesters of their pregnancy. A year after giving birth, their children were measured for their body mass index or BMI.

The researchers found that consuming artificial sweeteners during pregnancy was associated with an elevated risk of their babies being overweight. Children of the women who consumed a greater amount of sweeteners tended to have a higher BMI than those who were exposed to less. However, when a separate analysis was done for gender, the researchers found that the maternal consumption of sweeteners was only a risk for obesity in male children which supported the results of previous animal research.

The abstract of the recent study is available here. As well as potentially increasing the risk of obesity for your unborn child, studies have demonstrated that consuming artificial sweeteners like sucralose, aspartame, and saccharin may be damaging to a breastfed baby. Only saccharin is considered unsafe during pregnancy or lactation but a study published in found that sucralose was also present in breast milk. The study which employed 20 breastfeeding mums collected breast milk samples and found that both saccharin and sucralose were present while no aspartame was detected.

Given the results of the two studies cited above, it would seem prudent to remain on the safe side of the fence and avoid using artificial sweeteners like sucralose during pregnancy and while breastfeeding. Researchers are still uncertain of the precise links between weight gain in adults and the consumption of artificial sweeteners. Observations, however, have led experts to believe there may be a link and researchers have hypothesized several ideas regarding potential links.

Firstly weight gain may occur due to changes in the way glucose is metabolized. Secondly, weight gain may be caused by an alteration in the gut microbiota. This study published in demonstrated that consuming artificial sweeteners could cause glucose intolerance because of the disruption in the intestinal microbiota.

Thirdly researchers believe that the consumption of artificial sweeteners disrupts appetite control and the ability to regulate calorific intake. According to research published in , rat models showed that the consumption of artificial sweeteners reduced the ability to distinguish between sweet tastes and impaired the ability to regulate intake of sweet and high calorie or high-fat food.

It is easy to avoid by simply not adding it to your food and drink. However, sucralose can be lurking in your food and drinks without you even knowing it.

Processed food manufacturers often add sucralose to their food and soft drinks during production. Sucralose is even sold in bulk to drug companies as an additive to certain medicines. Unfortunately, sucralose is not listed on drug information, so it may be unclear whether or not you are consuming it.

It is important to monitor the food, drinks, and medications you take. If you are consciously avoiding sucralose and any other artificial sweetener, but find that you are still suffering from the known sucralose side effects, start researching the ingredients of your medications and the foods and drinks that make up your diet.

Avoiding diet soft drinks better yet soft drinks altogether and processed food is one way to ensure that you are completely abstaining from harmful additives and toxins.

Other products that are known to contain sucralose: Your alternative to sugar has proven to be more harmful than sugar itself, but you still have that sweet tooth. Sugar is addicting, and giving it up is not as easy as it seems. Based on his study results, Sasaki recommended more extensive study of sucralose and 38 other food additives. Some concern has been raised regarding the effect of sucralose on the thymus, reports TripAtlas.

These studies found a decrease in mean thymus weight. The amount of sucralose given to the rats was 3, mg per kg of body weight daily for some 28 days. That would translate to g sucralose, or more than 20, individual packets of Splenda per day, for 28 days for a pound person, translates TripAtlas. Video of the Day. Uses of Vitamin B17 for Cancer. Side Effects of Kyo-Dophilus Probiotics. My mom watched a show and told me other people were having some of the same problems and thought it was because of Splenda sucralose.

I stopped using Splenda and within a week my symptoms were gone, just plain gone. Just the other day I had a tblspoon of sugar free dressing and by that night my legs and arms hurt so bad I couldnt make it up my steps standing up. Guess what was in that dressing. I will not touch the stuff now! While this article starts out well by explaining the chemistry of sucralose, it ends up being a non-informative article.

Table salt contains clorine sodium cloride , yet is perfectly safe in reasonable amounts; and the danger comes, not from the clorine in table salt, but from the sodium in excessive table salt intake. The studies so far say sucralose is safe; and trying to scare everyone without controlled studies showing proof of harm is a real dis-service to the public. Here is a post that will clear up the issue.

If one eats 40lbs of sugar a day this could be an issue. In this case if one eats 40lbs of sucralose. Now the article is very biased in several ways. FIrst, it does not clearly state that the issues arose in a study that was done on rats and was in far excess of what one would have in their lifetime. Second, the author does note that there are potentially severe chemicals in the sucralose.

However, it is a misconception by saying that these are potentially dangerous by them selves. Yes, Chlorine is dangerous by itself. So is breathing pure Oxygen. But when Oxygen is combined with other chemicals it provides the air we breathe and water we drink. I have the opposite problem. I can hardly find products made without sugar or aspartame or corn syrup and the like.

I have found it pretty difficult to find a selection of products that use sucralose or stevia. It is pretty maddening.

Why all the sugar and all the salt. The food industry is trying to kill us all. There may indeed be problems with these artificial sweeteners. Sugar not only causes obesity in high quantities each and every can of soda typically has 17 packets worth of sugar in it; how many do YOU drink a day?

All I know is I have family members with Type 2 diabetes and no can of Coke or Pepsi is worth that living hell. Good luck with that. It really tastes very similar to lemonade and only has a few calories per glass. So you either live with plain water that you might not want to ever drink because it tastes like nothing or minerals or you choose your POISON, be it sugar or artificial sweeteners.

Personally, I take my chance with the sweeteners and have occasional deserts made with real sugar but avoid sugary drinks entirely. The point is that some people are allergic to artificial sweeteners and they should avoid them. I am a bit concerned lately, however that Pepsi just changed over their diet colas to sucralose from aspartame. This clearly changes the flavor. Diet Coke with Splenda has a bad aftertaste it tastes shockingly just like a teaspoon of sucralose if you taste it directly.

It may taste better than saccharin and I personally think it works better in coffee and unsweetened juices better than aspartame, but IMO aspartame tastes better in soda at least until it expires. For example, my mother stopped eating yogurt PERIOD because they changed her Yoplait Light over to Splenda and she says it tastes awful now and she really misses the original Yoplait Light with aspartame.

I wonder if Yoplait realizes how many customers they lost with that switch. She would do well to find something else to please her or get used to the taste, because Aspartame was extremely toxic … and the only reason it was ever passed by the FDA is that somebody greased some palms with green.

These things DO cause health problems and cancer. In fact, aspartame is less toxic than sucralose in terms of daily allowance by quite a lot. Aspartame has been on the market for ages. If it were toxic to anyone other than those allergic to it in everyday quantities 16 cans of diet pop I believe is the limit per day relative to dosage compared to only around for sucralose.

The studies you talk about were made and funded by the same company that produces this product. The studies cited are pier reviewed published works.

RISKS VERSUS BENEFITS OF THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL SWEETENERS